<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Husband of But One Wife</title>
	<atom:link href="http://llboone.wordpress.com/2008/06/26/husband-of-but-one-wife/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://llboone.wordpress.com/2008/06/26/husband-of-but-one-wife/</link>
	<description>Exploring and Growing in Faith</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:14:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://llboone.wordpress.com/2008/06/26/husband-of-but-one-wife/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://llboone.wordpress.com/?p=34#comment-62</guid>
		<description>I was once a member of a Church of Christ congregation.  There I learned all that stuff about elders being the husband of one wife meaning currently married, married exactly once.

Yet today I am a divorced and currently unmarried elder in an independent Christian Church of the Restoration Movement.  When I felt called to step up, I had to come to the same conclusion you did, that &quot;husband of one wife&quot; is best understood as &quot;one woman man.&quot;  

I&#039;m reminded of the fellow in the CoC congregation, a lifelong member who insisted that a man with only one child could not be an elder, because the Word says you must have children.  I asked, &quot;Okay, so if you have one child and I ask you if you have children, are you going to say no?&quot;  He replied, &quot;I wouldn&#039;t want to risk hell for getting it wrong.&quot;

That blew my mind.  Didn&#039;t Paul say in Galatians that Christ set us free for freedom&#039;s sake?  I think we risk putting on the yoke of slavery when we subdivide the word this far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was once a member of a Church of Christ congregation.  There I learned all that stuff about elders being the husband of one wife meaning currently married, married exactly once.</p>
<p>Yet today I am a divorced and currently unmarried elder in an independent Christian Church of the Restoration Movement.  When I felt called to step up, I had to come to the same conclusion you did, that &#8220;husband of one wife&#8221; is best understood as &#8220;one woman man.&#8221;  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m reminded of the fellow in the CoC congregation, a lifelong member who insisted that a man with only one child could not be an elder, because the Word says you must have children.  I asked, &#8220;Okay, so if you have one child and I ask you if you have children, are you going to say no?&#8221;  He replied, &#8220;I wouldn&#8217;t want to risk hell for getting it wrong.&#8221;</p>
<p>That blew my mind.  Didn&#8217;t Paul say in Galatians that Christ set us free for freedom&#8217;s sake?  I think we risk putting on the yoke of slavery when we subdivide the word this far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
